
Wednesday, 19th November 2008
Transition from primary to secondary school
More inclusive system proposed
Junior Lyceum exam to be replaced by benchmarking tests
The streaming mechanism that pigeonholes schoolchildren according to their overall exam performance will gradually be replaced with a more inclusive system based on each student's level of attainment in individual subjects.
The government's planned reform aims to do away with the distinction between the state's junior lyceums for high achievers and the lower grade area secondary schools. In order to enter the lyceums, pupils need to obtain a pass mark in all five junior lyceum exams: Maltese, English, maths, religion and social studies.
Instead, all students in state schools will move on to mixed-ability secondary schools that form part of the college system after sitting for a new form of final exam at the end of primary school, consisting of Maltese, English and maths.
More emphasis will be put on spoken languages with oral school-based tests at the end of Year 6.
The final exam will serve as a benchmark of the pupils' attainment and the students in secondary school will then be taught in groups, through a "setting" mechanism, depending on their needs in different subjects, rather than streamed into different classes as is the case now.
Unlike the junior lyceum entrance exam that is held in May, the end-of-primary exam will be held in June giving students more time to prepare.
The exam will also be offered to Church and independent schools but, for the time being, not imposed on them.
"Our aim is to move away from the pass or fail mentality and reduce the stress imposed on children through exams... We want to give them back their childhood," said Grace Grima, director general at the Directorate for Quality and Standards in Education, at the launch yesterday of a consultation document on the transition from primary to secondary school.
She stressed that the proposals are built on the positive aspects of the existing education system while doing away with methods that no longer work.
The consultation document is the result of 18 months of meetings with stakeholders - including children, parents, teachers and representatives from state, Church and private schools - and proposes implementing the reform within six years.
Another important aspect of the reform is the removal of streaming in state primary schools. Under the present system, students start being streamed in Year 5 after they undergo five centrally-set written annual exams, again in Maltese, English, maths, religion and social studies, in Year 4.
These exams will be retained under the new system but their purpose will no longer be to stream pupils, who will remain in mixed-competence classes.
The annual assessment in Years 4 and 5 will still consist of the five centrally-set written exams, plus school-based assessment in other curriculum subjects.
If approved, the new system will be phased in over a few years. It will start with students that are in Year 4 this year. Those who are in Years 5 and 6 would keep to the existing system but will be given the opportunity to re-sit one subject.
External monitoring will be introduced in the fourth year of the proposed reform (when the present Year 4 students are in Form 1) to evaluate children's learning in different areas of the curriculum in Years 4, 5 and 6 and Forms 1 and 2.
Education Minister Dolores Cristina insisted that these proposals were part of a larger reform of the education system that includes the revision of the national minimum curriculum by the end of next year.
Another two consultation documents will soon be launched. One deals with the acquisition of core competences in early primary school and the other aims at changing the secondary school-leaving certificate so that more weight is given to non-subject based activities.
The consultation document on the transition from primary to secondary school can be viewed on www.education.gov.mt and feedback can be sent to skola@gov.mt by January 15.




RSS
Comments
Hope attention is given to 'how well' things are taught and learnt rather than 'how much' is done; at present, sillabii are never ending and seemingly ever increasing (maths) with now additional curricular subjects. I'm afraid it's the basics that are the real problem. Every method in the book, every activity at primary level should utlimately aim at helping students attain literacy up to a basic and simple level. I'd rather have a ten-year-old who can write a short - subject verb object - correct sentence in both Maltese and in English rather than one who writes a complex sentence with adjectives and idioms, that is riddled with mistakes.
Keep life at primary level simple and enjoyable - if this happens then students will be more receptive when the time to widen their knowledge eventually comes.
I hope that we stop trying to fit children into identical compartments and not expect them to perform the same at the same rate. They are not the same!
If you know of primary school students who finish their homework at 10.00pm then you better report the teacher that he/she starts the training all over again. It is NOT the homework which completes the teaching but the proper lessons at school. For generations children went to school until 4.00pm and they had very little homework; they had time to play, they passed their exams and eventually they generally succeeded in life. And this was done with NO PRIVATE LESSONS after school hours.
I check and know my facts very well and I just wish the best for my son!!!
No changes to the system should be implemented before serious pilot studies are conducted. We could end up in a worse position than we are now.
We then messed up the system by regularly increasing the number of 11+ exam passes to pander to demands of parents to see their children in the junior lyceum even if they were not particularly gifted.
This original number of about 1/6th of the school population kept increasing so that now it hovers round 60% of those sitting for the junior lyceum.
It is this fact that is patently unfair as it condemns 40% to the waste bin.
We should have three different kinds of ability school for the bottom 1/6th the middle 2/3 and the top 1/6.
Radically different teaching methods are required for these group of students. Our teacher training prepares mainly a general teaching practitioner from the ability point of view.
What should be the first step is for teachers to be speciality trained for these different kinds of service.
Quote:If necessary the hours of attendance should be increased to allow for this to take place.
Most primary school children finish their homework at about 10pm. They have no time to play let alone watch TV. What happens if they finish school at say 4pm, will they have to stay up until 11.30pm to finish their work?
Quote:Does removal of examinations mean that the teachers will now have less incentive to push through what little syllabus is left for the children to learn?
Examinations will remain. And what do you mean ....what little syllabus is left....... little syllabus my foot! Do you have any idea how vast the Social studies syllabus is, the mathematics syllabus (my daughter has maths HW EVERY day), etc?
Check out your facts before you write about our children's education.
Reading out the plan I noticed that Year 4 students are going to be assessed on Science plus the usual 5 subject exams at June next year. Does this mean that another subject is going to be introduced for them to study? Don't they have more than enough?
More emphasis should be placed in the fluency in literacy and numeracy.